Skip Navigation
TAI-ÉCOSAFE
TAI-ÉCOSAFE Luxembourg
Classification Hybride des Plantes Dangereuses

Danger Categories

TAI-ECOSAFE Luxembourg v8.6

Hazard-Based Annotation Framework for Biodiversity Data.

Independent methodological framework providing structured biological hazard metadata (toxicity, allergenicity, invasiveness) as an annotation layer for biodiversity occurrence data ecosystems.

Based on TAI-ECOSAFE Conceptual Framework v1.2 including allergenicity assessment (150M+ affected Europeans)

🔍 Search Plants 📖 Methodology v8.6 📚 Framework v1.2

TAI-ECOSAFE — Hazard-Based Annotation Framework for Biodiversity Data

Independent methodological framework for biological hazard assessment in biodiversity informatics

TAI-ECOSAFE is a methodological framework designed to systematize biological hazard information as an independent annotation layer for biodiversity occurrence data. Built on the Symbiota platform and compatible with GBIF data standards, it provides structured metadata on intrinsic hazards (toxicity, allergenicity, invasiveness) without modifying taxonomic classifications or conservation status assessments.

The framework is based on published, peer-reviewable methodology with permanent DOI identifiers and operates according to hazard-based principles established in the Conceptual Framework v1.2.

Positioning Within Biodiversity Science

TAI-ECOSAFE is not a biodiversity classification system. It does not assign conservation value or modify taxonomic interpretation. Instead, it functions as an independent, hazard-oriented annotation layer designed to complement existing biodiversity data ecosystems.

Key Principle:

The framework assesses intrinsic biological hazards (inherent danger properties) independent of exposure context, conservation status, or probabilistic risk calculations.

TAI-ECOSAFE Provides

  • Hazard-based metadata layer
  • Human health context (toxicity, allergenicity)
  • Animal safety context
  • Ecosystem management context (invasiveness)
  • Reproducible assessment criteria

Compatible With

  • GBIF occurrence data
  • IUCN Red Lists
  • Taxonomic classification systems
  • National biodiversity databases
  • Conservation status assessments

Assessment Parameters & Scope

Primary Parameters (T-A-I System)

T
Toxicity
Human health hazards assessed on the basis of acute toxicity (LD₅₀ scale, scores 0–5). Contact allergenicity (CLP H317) belongs to the ALL index, distinct from the T parameter.
Based on CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
A
Animal Hazard
Animal toxicity data from documented veterinary cases, clinical literature, and toxicological databases
Sources: ASPCA, EFSA, peer-reviewed veterinary literature
I
Invasiveness
Invasive species classification based on documented ecological impact and regulatory status
Based on EU Regulation 1143/2014, regional invasive species lists

Core Indices

FXT
Fast Toxicity
Onset of symptoms < 2h
CHD
Child Hazard
Attractive berries/flowers that are also toxic
BAN
EU Banned
EU List 1143/2014
ALL
Allergenic
Contact allergenicity (CLP H317) and inhalation allergenicity of pollen/spores (EAACI/WHO ARIA). Threshold: >1M affected in Europe. Activates the PURPLE category.
CLN
Clinical Documented
At least one of criteria A–E met (see Annex C)
THR
Threatened Species Status
IUCN ∈ {CR, EN, VU}. Conservation context, informational only — does not change the classification color.

Automated Flags

ECO
Ecological Integrity Flag
Auto-generated: IF I ≥ 3. Never assigned manually.
VET
Veterinary Emergency Flag
Auto-generated: IF A ≥ 4. Never assigned manually.

Research & Institutional Collaboration

TAI-ECOSAFE is in active development and institutional validation phase. The framework welcomes academic engagement and collaborative research to advance biological hazard assessment methodology within biodiversity informatics.

🔬 Current Status: Seeking Peer Review & Validation

Open to institutional compatibility assessment, methodological consultation, and research collaboration

Methodological Peer Review

Critical evaluation of assessment criteria, reproducibility standards, and scientific foundation

Data Architecture Consultation

Integration pathways with GBIF, Symbiota, iNaturalist, and other biodiversity data platforms

Scientific Co-authorship

Collaborative research on methodology papers, validation studies, and case study publications

Institutional Compatibility Assessment

Evaluation of framework positioning within research institutions and biodiversity initiatives

Cross-Database Integration Studies

Research on annotation layer architecture and interoperability with existing data systems

Field Validation & Ground-Truth Testing

Application of methodology in specific geographic contexts and urban biodiversity settings

Database Statistics

331
Total Species
46
High Danger
23
Invasive Species
5
Allergens